Our Friends

This geologic feature, Duck On A Rock, located along the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, was vandalized with graffiti.

This geologic feature, Duck On A Rock, located along the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, was vandalized with graffiti.

Rate this article:

Printer friendly view Send to a friend

Graffiti: Is It By Definition Vandalism Or Can It Be Art?

Graffiti Incident in Grand Canyon USA Brings Charges Of Defacing National Landmark

Written by Todd Wilkinson (Authors Bio)

There is no excuse for stupidity, ever.

Whether it's a deranged visitor taking a razor blade to a masterpiece in a museum or a youthful vandal allegedly spray painting his name across a landmark in the Grand Canyon—one of the true natural wonders of the world—outrage isn't difficult to come by.

Where graffiti is concerned, much it seems depends on context and intention.  Is it done with malice in mind or ironically to spruce up a blighted area?

While on their 1804-1806 trek across the American West, William Clark of the Lewis & Clark Expedition carved his name into the natural stone monolith called Pompeys Pillar in Montana.  The native Americans who saw it might have viewed it as an act of destruction.  Today it's a historic artifact (not to mention a national monument).

Wildlife Art Journal readers will find this report from Kurt Repanshek at National Parks Traveler to be intriguing. Kurt has a story about a Canadian man, Lucien Lionel Chenier, who is  accused of spray painting part of his name into the Duck on the Rock outcrop in Grand Canyon National Park. 

Kurt obtained a copy of the arrest report and this was the description of the park ranger who apprehended the suspect: 

"Chenier admitted that he spray painted the letters 'LUCI' in red spray paint on the Duck on a Rock Feature. Chenier told me that he intended to write his full first name, Lucien. He stopped only because the tour leader and bystanders started yelling at him."

Chenier is now facing federal charges;  deservedly so.

On the other hand, some acts of graffiti can also result in good, not harm.  Read this WAJ story, When Barbarians Crash The Gate , about the London-based Graffiti Kings.  After years of being called outlaws, the Kings have actually been enlisted to help improve eyesore neighborhoods in England's capital city.  In fact, some of the Kings also think of themselves as wildlife artists.

What do you think about graffiti.  Is it art or a criminal act?  What should the penalties be for perpetrators who deliberately try to damage private and public property? 



Rate this article:

Printer friendly view Send to a friend

header_discussion-blog
There are currently no comments for this article. You could be the first!

Leave your comment

Your e-mail address will not be publicly displayed, but is required. We respect your privacy and
never send spam. Read our privacy policy for details...
Your Name*:
* = required fields
eMail Address *:
Comment Headline*:
What is your comment?*

Hard to read? See a new code.
Please type the letters you see in the image above. This helps us to prevent spam submissions.
Enter code here:

Already a subscriber? Log-in here.

LOG-IN HERE
Lost Your Password?

Recently Tweeted

With rhino poaching an epidemic in southern Africa, shoot to kill is the norm in some parks.... Johnny Rodrigues... http://t.co/HYKeRt2G

Facebook

Receive our free articles by email

Sign up now and we'll send you a free monthly newsletter that reminds you of important stories in Wildlife Art Journal, blogs and other content you'll want to know about.

First Name:

Email Address:

Yes, please let me know about special subscription savings.