Our Friends

Grizzly Bear 610 and her cubs in Grand Teton National Park, photo by Thomas Mangelsen

Grizzly Bear 610 and her cubs in Grand Teton National Park, photo by Thomas Mangelsen

Rate this article:

Printer friendly view Send to a friend

Bear Watching Mayhem In Yellowstone, Grand Teton

Challenge, Experts Say, Is Managing People, Not Animals

Written by Todd Wilkinson (Authors Bio)

There has been a debate raging this summer in the northern Rockies over restrictions placed on how people should be allowed to observe wildlife in national parks.  Given the enormous popularity of two mother grizzly bears and cubs in Grand Teton National Park—and huge crowds gathered along the roadside—stipulations were put in place that require people to stay at least 100 yards away from bruins at all times.

What it means is that if a bear indicates that it wishes to approach the roadside or cross to the other side, people need to move.  This has caused a backlash from professional wildlife photographers.

While the vast, vast majority of park visitors are well behaved, there are always defiant individuals who venture too close, throw food to wildlife or simply behave cluelessly.  For those interested in reading a story in the Christian Science Monitor about the Grand Teton "Wildlife Brigade" that keeps people and animals separated, click here .

Fortunately, grizzlies exhibit a high level of tolerance.  In this video, passed along by Yellowstone officials, one doesn't need an active imagination to recognize what could go wrong were a bruin to suddenly act aggressively.  NOTE:  After you watch this video, click on this corresponding 24-second footage titled "man photographing grizzly bear mother and two cubs" .  The level of stupidity will take your breath away.

What do you think? We welcome your comments below at the far bottom of the page.

Rate this article:

Printer friendly view Send to a friend

header_discussion-blog

Casting A Broad Net Punishes The Majority

Posted By S.K. on Mar 28, 2012
As a photographer I travel to the National Parks and beyond with the express purpose of capturing nature and wild life. I traveled to Glacier Park in July 2011 and had three different bear sightings. Though jazzed I would never put myself in danger. Most pro photographers use long lenses.
National Parks dispense literature including wildlife warnings and educational information when entering the park. Most have educational/ info sites within the park and also warning signs , such as being "Bear Aware" throughout the park. I feel they do a great job of educating and warning.
You will never be able to relegate common sense! There will always be risk takers with bad judgement. Why limit the number of people when the majority are not the problem.
On my last journey there were persons walking over signs clearly warning of the danger above a powerful waterfall. Through the water spray mist we saw them continue to the top along the slippery side cliff stepping around wring signs. Many of us watched in amazement and horror. A week or so later there was a tragic drowning in a national park with apparently this same scenario.I've seen the same behavior exhibited with wildlife risk takers. There are always a few who will ignore whatever the warning may be. Is changing the admittance of the majority going to help?

What are they thinking?

Posted By Diana on Dec 6, 2011
These people are selfish with an entitlement mentality. They think they should get their shot at all cost to show their friends. What's wrong with a high powered Zion lense?. They delude themselves into thinking these bears are 'docile' when they show no agression from the outset. But they are dangerous, especially with cubs or when their food is threatened. A bear can cover a hundred yards in a matter of seconds, faster than a human could manage in trying to flee. Yet, people raise cain when someone in a park is killed by a bear. Even worse scenario is habituating a bear by feeding it and making it more agressive when the food is gone. The result is often to euthanize the bear. I believe anyone who behaves like these folks should be banned from all national parks for life.

People should be fined

Posted By Katie on Sep 5, 2011
I think people should be fined if they get too close to the animals. I am from Boston and was in Grand Teton in July and watched the mother bears 399, 610 and their cubs for a week, from the proper distance, so did the professional shooters that were there. It was toursist who kept violating the rules while the photographers were actually helping the rangers with the location and distance of the bears and telling people to keep back at a safe distance, they were ALL doing this from their cars whether in them or on top of them which is what the Rangers were telling people to do. The problem is that there aren't any consequences for these stupid people when they break the rules or put the themselves, the animals or other people in danger so what do they care? They should be fined and thrown out of the parks. The consequence for the bears are death. I don't think the $25 park fee is worth the life of a bear.
There are 5 more comments for this article See All Comments >

Leave your comment

Your e-mail address will not be publicly displayed, but is required. We respect your privacy and
never send spam. Read our privacy policy for details...
Your Name*:
* = required fields
eMail Address *:
Comment Headline*:
What is your comment?*

Hard to read? See a new code.
Please type the letters you see in the image above. This helps us to prevent spam submissions.
Enter code here:

Already a subscriber? Log-in here.

LOG-IN HERE
Lost Your Password?

Recently Tweeted

With rhino poaching an epidemic in southern Africa, shoot to kill is the norm in some parks.... Johnny Rodrigues... http://t.co/HYKeRt2G

Facebook

Receive our free articles by email

Sign up now and we'll send you a free monthly newsletter that reminds you of important stories in Wildlife Art Journal, blogs and other content you'll want to know about.

First Name:

Email Address:

Yes, please let me know about special subscription savings.