UNTITLED (cellphone), acrylic, sea shell and glass vessel on gessoed MDF board, 5 X 3 inches,(Photo credit: William Eakin) By Cliff Eyland
Subscribers may see all 2 images.
BOOKSHELF FILE CARD LK 138, acrylic paint on gessoed MDF board, 3 X 5 inches, (2009) By Cliff Eyland
Subscribers may see all 2 images.
PLAYPAUSE
Photo 1 of 2
PREV.NEXT


Wildlife Art’s Lingering 'Inferiority Complex?'

Painter, Teacher and Critic Cliff Eyland Says Nature Artists Need To Step Up Or Be Irrelevant

Written By Cliff Eyland (Author's Bio)

$4.00
to purchase this article.

    Your Purchase Includes:
  • Printer friendly version.
  • Ability to forward the full article to 3 friends.
  • You may view or print the article an unlimited number of times.
  • No expiration dates. Purchased articles are always available in the 'My Account' section.

Purchase Article

Subscribe and save! Premium subscribers are given full access to our article archives and the current issue of Wildlife Art Journal.

By Cliff Eyland

Has wildlife art truly arrived?

Or, are artists still stuck dwelling in the past, victimized by their own defeatist attitudes?

I believe the answer to both questions is “yes”.

Before wildlife art can claim title to a place of authority and meaning in the 21st century, I believe it must show the conviction that it deserves to be treated with seriousness.

A decade and a half ago when most of us were visualizing the world differently than we do today, I wrote an essay that I would like to revisit.  It is my hope that it will incite a response.  I want wildlife artists to fight for their own voice.

In the autumn of 1996, Art Gallery of Southwestern Manitoba in Winnipeg hosted a symposium titled "The Unpeacable Kingdom" that examined a growing controversy in Canada, the United States and Europe over the “legitimacy” of wildlife art. 

My essay was a response to that event and it was published in the magazine, Border Crossings.

I asked: What do wildlife artists want?

Answer: Art world recognition.

Why does the art world resist?

Answer: Most wildlife art is not intellectually engaging.
 


I believe it is still the case today and yet many more wildlife artists now, as opposed to then, are trying to make a statement with their work, through artistry, the desire to be fresh and original, and the conviction that wildlife...

Additional Article Information:

· Article is 1,261 words long (250 are displayed in this preview).

Author: Cliff Eyland

Editor's Comments:

'Cliff Eyland says wildlife art still suffers from a lingering inferiority complex.  A painter, teacher, and critic, he believes nature artists need to step up or be irrelevent to the larger art conversation in this century. '

Research tags: wildlife+art+journal, wildlifeartjournal.com, Cliff eyland, , cliff+eyland, Michael dumas, wildife+art, Michael-dumas, michael+dumas, wildlife art, wildlife art, wildlife art journal, wildlife+art+journal, wildlife-art-journal, Robert-bateman, Robert bateman, robert+bateman, university of Manitoba school of art Winnipeg, winnpeg millennium library, leo kamen gallery, Robert Wrigley, Robert-wrigley, alex-colville, alex colville, Robert j koenke, Robert-koenke, wildlife art news, wildlife-art-news, Canada Council, Ontario Arts Council, Canada-council, colleen cutschall, colleen-cutschall, gallery one one one, gallery-one-one-one, Ontario-arts-council, Sigrid dahle, Sigrid-dahle

Already a subscriber? Log-in here.

LOG-IN HERE
Lost Your Password?

Recently Tweeted

Our final two cover candidates are this ostrich piece by James Stroud and George McLean's, below http://t.co/oA8UiFHD

Facebook

Receive our free articles by email

Sign up now and we'll send you a free monthly newsletter that reminds you of important stories in Wildlife Art Journal, blogs and other content you'll want to know about.

First Name:

Email Address:

Yes, please let me know about special subscription savings.